CTO and VP Engineering searches have the widest skill-scope variation of any executive hire. This page benchmarks timelines, comp, and failure rates so you can calibrate your search before it starts.
No executive title has wider variance in role definition than CTO. At a Series A company, the CTO may be the only senior engineer — writing code, making architecture decisions, and hiring the first 5 engineers. At a Series C company, the same title describes a leader managing 60 engineers through VPs and Directors, who has not written production code in 3 years. The search that succeeds is the one that defines which of these roles it is actually filling — and sources for that profile specifically.
| Role Definition | Industry Median | Top Quartile | Majhi Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical CTO (hands-on, <20 eng) | 80–95 days | 55–65 days | 42–52 days |
| Engineering CTO (manager-of-managers) | 75–90 days | 50–60 days | 40–50 days |
| VP Engineering (Series B/C team leader) | 70–85 days | 48–58 days | 38–48 days |
| Fractional / advisory CTO | 25–40 days | 15–22 days | 14–20 days |
| Stage | Base Range | Total Comp Range | Typical Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Series A (technical CTO) | $180–230K | $220–290K | 0.4–1.2% |
| Series B (VP Eng) | $220–270K | $270–350K | 0.2–0.5% |
| Series C (CTO, manager-of-managers) | $260–320K | $320–420K | 0.1–0.25% |
| PE-backed / late-stage | $280–360K | $340–480K | 0.05–0.15% |
The most common failure mode in CTO and VP Engineering searches is the builder-manager mismatch: a technically strong individual contributor is hired into a management leadership role, and either struggles to delegate effectively or regresses to hands-on technical work while the management function suffers. The inverse also occurs: an experienced engineering manager is hired for a stage that requires deep technical hands-on leadership.
The question that separates the right CTO from the plausible CTO: "Walk me through a technical decision where you were wrong, and how you found out." The answer reveals technical humility, decision-making process, and how they handle dissent from their team — three of the highest-signal attributes for CTO success at growth-stage companies.
CTO and VP Engineering assessments that produce high-retention placements consistently cover four areas beyond the resume: technical vision and architecture thinking at the company's current stage; management philosophy and how they develop engineers below them; founder relationship and how they handle technical disagreement; and what they need from the CEO to succeed. The last item — what they need — is the one most frequently skipped and the one most often cited in post-departure conversations as the root of the breakdown.
Sources & methodology: Majhi Group placement data (CTO and VP Engineering searches, 2022–2026); Radford Global Technology Survey 2025; AESC Executive Search Review 2025; Korn Ferry Engineering Leadership Benchmarks.
20-minute confidential search assessment. We assess whether your search timeline, criteria, and approach are optimised for the hire you need.
Request a Search Assessment →